Political commentator Frank Gashumba has defended former Kira Municipality MP Ibrahim Ssemujju Nganda’s decision to remain in exile, saying the move could allow him to continue contributing to public discussions and political activities.

Gashumba, known for his outspoken comments on national issues, said Ssemujju’s decision should be understood as a personal choice based on his own assessment of the circumstances surrounding him.

Speaking during a radio interview, Gashumba said he supports Ssemujju’s decision to stay outside Uganda, arguing that remaining alive and free gives a person the opportunity to continue making an impact.

“I support Ssemujju for going into exile. A lion can’t be tough when it’s dead. Even a cat can pee in a dead lion’s ears,” Gashumba said.

He explained that people facing difficult situations often have to weigh different factors, including their safety, responsibilities and ability to continue contributing to society.

Gashumba said fear has become a major factor influencing some Ugandans who choose to remain outside the country rather than return home amid concerns about possible arrest or detention.

“There is too much fear. These are facts. People are scared. It’s unbelievable,” he said.

He questioned whether staying in exile could sometimes be preferable to being imprisoned, arguing that a person’s ability to communicate and participate in public affairs can be limited while behind bars.

Gashumba said that while some people may criticize those who leave the country, others view exile as a way of remaining active and continuing their work.

Ssemujju, who previously served as Kira Municipality Member of Parliament, left Uganda in June after expressing concerns about possible arrest and imprisonment.

The former legislator later said his decision to remain outside Uganda was personal and based on his own evaluation of the situation.

Ssemujju explained that being outside the country allows him to continue research, advocacy and coordination with other people involved in public affairs.

He said that although imprisonment can carry symbolic importance, it may reduce an individual’s ability to make the contribution they are capable of making.

“If I go to prison like the Honourable Erias Lukwago and Doctor Kizza Besigye, will I still be making a contribution?” Ssemujju said.

He added that people can still contribute to causes they believe in regardless of where they are located.

Ssemujju emphasized that his decision should not be seen as advice for every opposition politician, saying each person must make their own assessment before deciding what action to take.

Gashumba also reflected on how personal circumstances can change the way people view risks and challenges.

He revealed that there was a time when he was not afraid of death and had a different attitude towards life before family responsibilities changed his perspective.

“I wasn’t scared of death. I had given up on life. I would just enjoy my money. But now things changed now that I have a family,” Gashumba said.

His remarks have sparked discussions about the choices public figures make when facing political pressure, with different people debating the balance between personal safety and public service.

Some argue that leaders should remain and face challenges within the country, while others believe staying away can allow them to continue contributing without restrictions.

The debate surrounding exile, political activism and personal decisions continues as different public figures share their views on how individuals should respond during challenging times.

Gashumba maintained that staying alive and having the freedom to act are important for anyone who wants to continue making a difference in society.